IamJacks hits it on the head with the importance of being earnest when it comes to schlock. VERY rarely does intentional camp work. When a film comes out and says it's "so bad it's good" from the outset -- it kinda defeats the purpose.
Witness the witless oeuvre of one Larry Blamire.
I would also contend that a film's BUDGET also is a factor. I've never been able to be on board with those who say a $80M dollar film like BATTLE: L.A. or a $75M one like BATTLEFIELD EARTH are just pure B Movie fun! For that kind of money, it's not just good enough to do a higher gloss version of some $300,000 low budget 50s film. You expect
something in the way of plot, characterization and innovation (not to mention having learned a thing or two in the past 50 years!).
IamJacksUserID wrote:
I support a reappearance of the gloriously terrible
Pieces, but have to vote a big NO to
Birdemic. I've already laid out my thoughts in detail about this movie last year in
this thread.Terrible schlock that was made in earnest needs to develop it's entertainment value organically over time. This garbage was sold from the get-go as a "cult classic" and it never works out that way.
And by the way, I still highly recommend Adam Carolla's daily
podcast, although the format has changed (for the better) since I first plugged it last year.