I can’t imagine much of middle America liking Zodiac. Most will walk into the theater expecting a taught, suspenseful, serial killer movie, but what they will get will be an artful movie about obsession centered on the lives of those who tracked the Zodiac killer over the years. That’s not to say that it isn’t suspenseful, because in parts it is, and in parts it is also disturbing and scary. It reminds me of Fight Club in that, I think, most expected a bare-knuckle fight movie, but what they got was an art film about what it is to be a man, and the male image, and self image, and society’s expectations - not even clooooose to a testosterone driven fight movie.
The movie’s pacing is also going to turn people off. It is very deliberate. It kinda feels like – this happened, and then this happened, and this happened, and then this, etc. But it all builds and leads somewhere, it just doesn’t lead to a dramatic confrontation with the protagonist and the killer. You have to be more patient. It’s more of character piece. It has more in common with the movies from the time period in which it is set than it does with the movies of the time period in which it were made. I actually liked the pacing and editing. It’s a very hard thing to sustain, and I think this film does it well.
Joe already mentioned the ensemble cast. Yes, it is brilliant. Mark Ruffalo deserves an award for this film, but I am sure he will be loooong forgotten by the time award season rolls around again. Robert Downy Junior is also good as well as the huuuuge supporting cast – Brian Cox, Phillip Baker Hall, Chloe Sevigny, Anthony Edwards, Charles Fleischer, and Elias Koteas. Yes, Jake Gyllenhall is also good as the lead.
David Fincher has impressed me with every film he has made. He is a meticulous director who obsesses with every detail of his productions, from art direction, lighting, camera, and costumes. Interesting that such an obsessive person directed this movie about obsession. He is so meticulous, that I kind of think of him as a modern Hitchcock in that he cares about everything, including the color of the potted plant that is in the background. I remember hearing a story in film school about how Alfred Hitchcock had his art department crew saw of the branches of a tree so that it would have a “Y” split in it’s formation, because his film had the reoccurring theme of criss-cross (two lives intersecting). I think it was Strangers on a Train. Not that I think Fincher is like Hitchcock, but I do think that he is like him in this regard.
I would love to see more films by Fincher, but because he is so detailed oriented when it comes to making films, it takes him several years to make them. Not quite as bad as Kubrick, but still. I’m sure he researches and researches and researches and plots and plans. He is the opposite of someone like Takeshi Miike who seems to almost make it up as he goes along. By the way, I also love Miike and his style.
Anyway, go see it. Just don’t expect Se7en.
|