The Ohio Sci-Fi and Horror Marathons

The Official Forum of the Ohio Sci-Fi and Horror Marathons
It is currently Mon Sep 29, 2025 7:26 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Moon
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 12:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 5:49 am
Posts: 70
Location: Springfield OH
Caught this film Sunday. Smart, genuine sci-fi rather than an action movie using sci-fi as a cover. This would make a great booking next year. It messes with your mind in a good way.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 6:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 8:14 pm
Posts: 629
Location: Los Angeles
Note: Mild spoilers.

I got a chance to see this on a very good screen with all the bells and whistles.

I do like the fact that it's a 'throwback' feature more reliant on plot and character than flashy CGI and 'exciting' action scenes. Still, I think some in the critical and SF community have gone overboard with praise. When you read stuff like "instant classic" attached to it, that's a whole lot of baggage for a small film to carry. Folks are so starved for any SF film of substance during this era of sequels, remakes and rehashes, that the bar has been set low. In the 70s and 80s, there were several films every year of this caliber released - now, it seems so only once in a...ahem...blue moon.

Spoiler area:

The story is certainly interesting. It takes on the ideas of AI, cloning and space explorations in a nice way. Kevin Spacey's voice annoys, not just because it's Spacey, but because the 'name' voice intrudes upon the low-key setup. And, the whole reason for the plant on the moon and how it is 'manned' for work never really seems to be worth the effort of the corporation to go so far to "use" its workers.

In the end, it would have made a perfectly fine TWILIGHT ZONE episode back in the day. SF fans will dig all the references to 2001, BLADE RUNNER, DARK STAR etc.. Definately worth seeing. Sure, the limited budget shows up more in a great movie theater, but they did a good job within their means to deliver the sets and special effects. You don't need hundreds of millions of dollars to have giant 'bots stomping across Egypt to have a visual impact.

_________________
Long Live the Orson Welles Cinemas


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Moon
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 11:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 10:42 pm
Posts: 9
Neat little movie.
A nice throwback to the days before it was all about effects. It is basically a two man play with Kevin Spacey providing the voice for the computer....

It would be good to see this at a the next marathon.....

_________________
Frank - Boston Sci-Fi festival prize guy and lobby decorator


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moon
PostPosted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:18 pm
Posts: 302
Location: Columbus, OH
SRCputt wrote:
Caught this film Sunday. Smart, genuine sci-fi rather than an action movie using sci-fi as a cover. This would make a great booking next year. It messes with your mind in a good way.


I saw this Sunday as well, just before I watched the new Harry Potter. I though the same thing ... I walked out of the auditorium thinking "FINALLY! It's been a while since I've seen a 'true' sci-fi film".

_________________
Remember ... no matter where you go, there you are.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 8:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 5:49 am
Posts: 70
Location: Springfield OH
Every marathon works best with a film that kind of slipped through the cracks: Timecrimes, The Iron Giant, Equilibrium, etc. This fits the slot. I'm not saying this is my favorite film of the year (that would be Up) but a film that I'd love to see again on a screen that would fit the mix of the marathon.

Two elements of the film I really liked: Clint Mansell's score building the tension, and Sam Rockwell's performance. I tend to root for Rockwell because he and I were born on the exact same day (11/5/68) but his slightly crazed persona fit this film perfectly. And I actually like Spacey's voice: he had clearly modeled his readings after HAL, which was a nice touch.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 1:50 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 472
Location: Dublin, OH
I was, perhaps, too critical of the film when I first saw it. I felt the latter 2/3rds drags on horribly.

The premise is interesting, if a little flawed. Rockwell's performance is superb. Spacey's vocal talent is spot-on. The effects are a good level of realistic yet subdued, allowing the story to take the center seat.

But ultimately, the movie reveals its cards very early on, and you're left exploring the various ramifications for a VERY long time. That's an awful lot of bread to cover with a small portion of jam.

I would find it a difficult add to the Marathon, as its pacing is awfully slow. It's very "Solaris" like in this regard ... more intellectual than entertaining. I think even true fans would find it difficult to stay awake were it in the wrong time slot, and it's not an energizing sort of film to show early.

Still, the person I saw it with disagreed, so again, I'm probably being too harsh. I'd call it Very Good, not Great.

_________________
David A. Zecchini; Creature of the Wheel, Lord of the Infernal Engines
"Damnati Im Ludum" (VitruvianZeke@att.net)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 10:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 8:14 pm
Posts: 629
Location: Los Angeles
I will say that - in Boston at least - Marathon audiences are Far more foregiving to new movies when it comes to slowness than they are to older films. It seems as though there is both a prejudice against older movies - especially if they are, GASP!, in Black in White - and a favoring towards newer films. And, if a film is a "Premiere" or an overlooked limited release newbie, then so much the better.

So, I think that, whatever it's flaws, MOON would do well with the crowd.


VitruvianZeke wrote:
I was, perhaps, too critical of the film when I first saw it. I felt the latter 2/3rds drags on horribly.

The premise is interesting, if a little flawed. Rockwell's performance is superb. Spacey's vocal talent is spot-on. The effects are a good level of realistic yet subdued, allowing the story to take the center seat.

But ultimately, the movie reveals its cards very early on, and you're left exploring the various ramifications for a VERY long time. That's an awful lot of bread to cover with a small portion of jam.

I would find it a difficult add to the Marathon, as its pacing is awfully slow. It's very "Solaris" like in this regard ... more intellectual than entertaining. I think even true fans would find it difficult to stay awake were it in the wrong time slot, and it's not an energizing sort of film to show early.

Still, the person I saw it with disagreed, so again, I'm probably being too harsh. I'd call it Very Good, not Great.

_________________
Long Live the Orson Welles Cinemas


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group