Joe Neff wrote:
The only thing that I'll add to this (ahem) stimulating back and forth is that, as I posted here before the SF Marathon, no one is forced to read every thread or to comment on every posting in every thread. There is sometimes a general trend of some forum members doing so (especially in the case of chastising certain lines of discussion which they aren't obligated to participate in), which results in some activity on this board looking troll-like.
This is an excellent point, and a very concise and diplomatic explanation. It's unfortunate that not everyone is able to understand that, or at least they never have been in the past given numerous chances.
All I want to say is this: I value the opinion of every member of this board who posts regularly or semi- regularly or even every great once in a while. That is, every member with the exception of exactly one. Now, I'm not going to start pointing fingers and getting personal, but I am pretty sure I am not the only one who feels this way.
If a troll does not want to define what is happening as trolling, then fine whatever, so be it. It is still polluting the river. As Joe so eloquently points out, the frequency sometimes may overwhelm the message. But when one attempts to brag about a truth and the language they use consistently defines it as an untruth, then any and all opinions they may have beyond that point become irrelevant.
Personally, I have learned how to make it across the bridge numerous times, but things that lurk in the river have a tendency to frighten away new travellers and those who don't cross the bridge very often.