I see film as an art form. Sometimes it earns this, sometimes it doesn't. I often admire shock art. I love viewing caravaggio's paintings, reading books like ellis' american psycho, listening to nick cave's murder ballads, and i like watching films like 'a serbian film'. While I like being entertained, I like it even more when films go beyond entertainment and force me to confront emotions, ideas, innovations and horrors beyond my personal experience.
If this were the sci-fi marathon, and there was an argument that a film may be too horrific, I would totally understand the desire to cut it from the line up. However, this is the Horror marathon. These films are meant to horrify us. Each year there is one that people accuse of going "too far" (irreversible, cannibal holocaust, cannibal ferox, etc). This year it seems to be either Martyrs or A Serbian Film. I'm hoping for Serbian Film. (unless it involves Corey not coming, i really want to see my good buddy and would choose him over a film any day).
A movie that didn't raise much outrage last year was 'Henry: portrait of a serial killer' even though during its original release, like A Serbian Film, it was accused of being too brutal and was shelved for 2 years. Ebert, who attacked 'nightmare on elm street 3' for appealing to teens, embraced the far more brutal Henry, writing "(it deals) honestly with its subject matter, instead of trying to sugar-coat violence as most 'slasher' films do." Horror films are best when they honestly deal with subject matter more 'serious' films shy away from.
I'm more disturbed by PG-13 cartoon violence, where someone gets shot falls over and dies painlessly, than I am violence that shows how brutal things actually are. In the words of Sam Peckinpah "I revolt against those which hide or ignore the social and moral perspectives of violence. It exists everywhere. It is part of our existence, it is in us."
Frontier(s) and Inside informed me of the current zenophobia in France. The "torture porn" movement in the US has exposed our psychic distress at terrorism and Abu Ghriab. It show a shift from our discomfort with supernatural entities (freddy, ghosts, etc.) to our terror of the potential of human cruelty.
Serbia is notorious for its sex trafficking.(
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_trafficking_in_Serbia) Might not 'a serbian film', like 'inside' and 'frontier(s)', be an honest, artistic, reaction to an actual domestic problem? It may be profound, or it may be junk, but i am curious.
In real life I'm a total pansy. I recoil from blood, i refuse to kill bugs, i've been a vegetarian for 15 years, I'm anti-war and pro-gun control. Art isn't real life though, it is a commentary on it, and I'm 100% pro-freedom of speech.
While I do have my limits (if they ever book water power, i'm skipping that movie) I don't think it is fair to try to censor a single film by threatening to skip the marathon if they show it. I hated 'Saw.' When they showed it at the marathon, rather than skip out entirely or watch it again, i opted out. I got a cup of coffee, read a book and took a walk. It was really nice. If you don't want to see a film, why not just do the same?